By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Acevil said:
naruball said:

Yes, but obviously it would have been better if it was delayed for a month or two(?) to fix everything. I think releasing a game in such a state is 10 times worse than a delay.

That is different argument, but I truthfully believe you will never have bethesda game with 99% glitch free experience without the audience pointing it out the glitches, no matter the time. 

(I need to word the sentence better, but what I mean to say is you will never have bethesda game glitch free)

From what I've heard it wasn't a simple case of some glitches here and there, there were actually a lot and obvious ones. They should have spent more time testing the game, but they thought that x time was enough. It wasn't. Instead of doing the right thing and delaying the game when they realised there were serious issues, they released it in an unacceptable state, knowing that due tot he name alone it would sell well, it would get free passes from critics and gamers, and that releasing it when it was actually ready (with some glitches, just not that many) would hurt its sales.

So, yeah I really don't think it should be used as an example in terms of delays.