By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Fei-Hung said:
Dunban67 said:

Does anyone think this is a good idea? The EU (a commission part of the EU) are ordering Brittian to keep its media from disclosing when terroists are Muslim.

Not only is that etreme censorship but most people would figure it out anyway when a terrorst attack occcurs and no one reported on who may have done it or who is taking resposibility-  

For the record the Britts do not have to abide by this orde and so far are not- aybe another reason to be pleased with Brexit? 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/717627/free-speech-crackdown-EU-report-British-press-hate-crime-violence-terror

 

I'm a Muslim and I disagree with this law, but I also disagree with how the media currently handle it. They either name the religion of every terrorist / criminal or they name non. 

 

Secondly, they need to understand the difference between a Muslim and a Khawarij. 

If a religion is a "rallying point" or core to a particular terrorists groups actions then yes religion is imprtant to name-  If not then it may not be anymore important than naming their favorite sports team- 

If a terrorist group from a muslim nation is making attacks because they are narco terrorists or some other non reliogion non Mulslim  reason and they just happen to be Muslim then I see no reason to make an issue of it at that point either-  but so far that has not often been the situation