By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
DonFerrari said:

You said you were going to play on the ultimate machine... and during the whole convo you were sure to point out Vive was the ultimate machine, where would we get that impression right?

Yep checked and not seeing things.

I just pointed out. And since you think putting 1k in desktop HW plus 800 on Vive, why wouldn't vive be your cheap VR headset?

And Sony still manufacture 3D TVs (mine is 4K 3D tv), console still support it, but they probably stopped launching 3D content on their AAA games because the resources drain versus the people asking for it didn't made any sense.

Kinect sold 20M+ on Xbox360 and still was forgotten on X1 even with like 10M sold.

Yes my PC is "My Ultimate" Machine, however in the same sentance i also said "using my cheap" vr goggles till i get my PSVR set. So why would i call Vive "My cheap" vr headset and then go on to say how im going to be getting PSVR An even cheaper VR headset to use on my pc.. Clearly its seeing things since its something i didnt say.

Yes lots of companys still make 3D tvs since the is still 3D movies coming out and i can still play pretty much all games in 3D using my PC.

However like i said if i only owned a PS3 and then a PS4 and wanted to play Sonys first party games in 3D after their hype id be very upset since its all but dead to them now, just as id imagine PSVR will be if it doesnt take off. Ill buy one anyways since i know even if sony does end support ill still get plenty of use out of it on my pc just like i did with my 3D tv and just like i am now with my "Cheap" vr headset.

Well, you were saying for the whole thread how good and cheap would be for someone to play on Vive, but you don't have one, and is using an even cheaper option than PSVR... how disapointing right?

Well yours PS3 games won't play on PS4. You could very well be upset, like were people about Linux. It would only show that you were a very minor parcel of their userbase. When you buy a product you are in a kind of investment that may or may not pay-off even more when it's a new technology, so no point in being disapointed that the rest of the market didn't bothered with it the same as you. I have Move (with two sets) and the camera for PS4 and almost no game to play, disapointing, but I can't blame a company for not wanting to push content that will make they bleed money.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."