By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 02 October 2016
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
DonFerrari said:

You know that anything that is mass produced will cost less than "custom made". And sure for console you can have something a little lower than Titan X, shave the most expensive parts, enjoy the few advantages of down to the metal to get a closer performance and you may get something very close to it for perhaps 60% of the price.

Negative. There's nothing less about it. A custome card is what one would get, but it would still be far too expensive for any kind of mass production in a console.

Thus, the statement, "If these guys were GPU vendors they'd leave everyone in the dust, we'd have Titan X performance for half the cost", is outlandish. Period.

If you that have a better understand of GPU can accertain that a TitanX can't be a mass market product then I agree that we wouldn't be able to see a cheapier price, but on console we can get a close equivalent on mass production and optimization (perhaps 20-30% weaker?) 



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."