By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mafioso said:
JEMC said:

 

Funny how you two see it so completely different.

Performance isn't great, Mafioso, because an 280X or an 960 are much more powerful than what's inside an XboxOne, yet they don't show that advantage. At the same time, hunter_alien, I wouldn't call it terrible either, as it's playable with a very wide range of cards.

Its a console port at the end of the day. 

I also look at that graph more openly. It doesn't show max framerate, and still the frame variance across all cards is fairly narrow.  The game does look better on PC, and XBO is not a 'Very High Quality' preset as far as image quality. Just some perspective, its clear this isn't some showcase of scalability but most people with a decent current gaming PC can play this title.

There are good, "meh" and bad console ports, and this one seems to be (at least to me) like a "meh" one. Remedy did a better job with Alan Wake.

 

By the way, here there are a couple videos comparing the DX11 and DX12 versions of Quantum Break:

http://www.dsogaming.com/news/quantum-break-runs-significantly-faster-on-nvidias-hardware-in-dx11/



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.