| aLkaLiNE said: It wouldn't because they can't prove that, and also because science has never been able to yield consistent unbreakable results pretty much ever. There's too much we don't know about and too much we can't get right for me to take everything the scientific community says as gospel |
That doesn't seem like a fair statement. Consistent results through scientific investigation have yeilded the entire microprocessor industry for one, nearly all forms of signal based communication, space travel, SPAM, automobiles and all of chemistry. I don't understand how you can know all of this and still have so much disdain for emperical observation. Science isn't 'we know everything'... its lets test something and see if we can predict the results and then lets interpert what those results tellus about the world around us. Thats all.
