PooperScooper said:
THATS COMPLETE BULLSHIT! You were Sonic fan so Ill use that as an example. So your a fan of sonic. The sequel is comming out in less than a month. You would like to know peoples opinion of the game. Now lets say there are 2 reviews for it. One review is from a Sonic lover such as yourself. Absolutly loved the sequel and thought it was a good follow up. The other is a FPS lover. He thought the game was boring, and bland. Didn't think it was fast paced enough. The visuals werent good enough and the graphics werent detailed enough. (common complaints) The first guy rates it a 95 the second guy rated it a 70. Whats more accurate? Taking a 82% avg or listening to the guy with the similar tastes?
|
1. i was a fan of sonic until heroes killed everything (notice the line through Sonic). sonic unleashed looks horrible.
2. score + quotes are both important. besides, whether u like sonic, or not, doesnt change the quality of the graphics, sound, et cetera. but still, ill be okay with the two, giving different scores. ill still look at the score, but ill also read the reasons for the scores, and the quotes. o and the scores will be of four digits like 82.34 because its more exact. more exact is just better, even if it doesnt mean anything more. i mean theres no reason for it, not to be better, so by default it is, cuz its... well... more... and more exact... so what is more accurate? well taking the 82% and listening to them. theres other reasons why, but i dont want to write an hour long page, so please. PLEASE JUST TAKE MY WORD. i really, really dont want to write an entire encyclopedia about it, because i know i could, because i subconsciencly confirmed, that the way it is, is better, than the other way, but i really, really dont want to.
