Poojipoo said:
I'm curious, am I missing something on the Clinton Foundation scandal? I've been doing a ton of research on it (and other aspects of each candidate to stay informed) but I'm having trouble understanding the controversy here. The Foundation's use of its funds are fully transparent and obviously going towards very good causes across the world... There's only allegations that the Clintons give special attention to donors, but no substantial evidence it had any negative impact in how Hillary did her job. There's definitely stuff of substance to criticize her for, but I'm having trouble finding evidence their Foundation is of importance?
On the flip side, Trump uses the Trump Foundation's charity earnings to pay off lawsuits for his businesses and buy paintings of himself. It's sort of hilarious to even compare the two foundations' work in this regard... |
I know no substantial evidence, but it's not easy to prove, and it seems she has very strong connection to prevent anyone to want to prove it (her IT guy got immunity !). Still, and that's New York time source, Bill get 500.000$ for a speech, her foundation get 2 millions $ from a russian company at the very same period where a deal is decided with this very company. Why would they give 2 millions it didn't have benefits ? What I'm saying is not a substantial prove for a court of justice, I understand that... but really, you believe they gave 2 millions to the vice president's foundation at this very moment... just by accident ? In all logic, they give because that helps them. Hence the controversy. This is just one case, but you can find documentation for multiple cases.
As for the OP question, I believe he unfortunately stand no chance. Just look at how biased the press is (there are crystal clear examples), the funds she get, the relationships she has, it's incredible.
