torok said:
I think that the biggest problems is that Apple insists on the Lightning port, while all other phones will use USB type-C. We will end up with a mess. Removing the jack is a good move, replacing it with their proprietary nonsense is stupid. Mind that removing the jack you get space that could go for more mAH. I'm not into buying Apple stuff just because of their pricing and proprietary nonsense. I'm also not much into Android high-ends, because current premium tier mid-end devices actually do a lot of stuff, unless you plan to game on them, so I'm not paying more just for crappy mobile games. I have a Moto X Play and for a phone that costed less than half most flagships (1/3 of an iPhone), it's fluid, camera is amazing and I even got a massive battery. I would say that a good deal now would be the Moto Z Play instead of any of the current flagships. Even the 64GB model of the Moto G4 costs only 300 on Amazon. That's a steal. |
Yes we are totally in the same page. Proprietary shit that is exorbitantly expensive isn't a good thing (even Memory Stick for Vita is well hated, even though it's quite cheap compared to this joke on earphones).
I paid around 200-250 USD in brazil for my Sony M4 while iPhone 6 was around 1k USD because I can't justify paying more than 400 USD on any phone because it is something that we change every 2 years or less, battery always suck and die off, OS doesn't update anymore, scratches, etc. So since M4 would do everything I needed I didn't have to look much further in expending more.
| Imaginedvl said: Clearly for the price you get more juice of this Play Station Four Pro but the main issue with the Play Station Four Pro tho is that it is freaking hot in the pocket! :)
How can you even compare the 2? :) |
I'm more curious on how did you put PS4 Pro on your pocket with all cables on it. How big are your paints?
| KBG29 said: Sadley the market deems smartphones as god like devices which they are all willing to go dish out $800+ every two years for, but they are disgusted by the idea of a $500 console or a $400 handheld. |
I also can't understand this shit... paying 800 USD every year for a phone (because a lot of people do upgrade every 6mo to 1y) while complaining about the price of a console at 400 that you change every 5y (for me the price of SW is a much bigger hassle) and only wanting to buy when it reaches 200.
exdeath said:
Or maybe it's like a CTS-V vs an A8. Better in everything, costs less, easier to maintain. Badge isn't as snobby, that's important to some people. Paying more for less like it's something to brag about. |
Yep, the guy makes the comparison be like why pay 500k for ferrari if a golf can get you there for 20k. When in reality is why pay a lot more for basically the same thing.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







