| Azuren said: The 850D suffers in black uniformity, and the 930D suffers loss of light at the edge of the screen. As far as the local illumination is concerned, you are wrong; the 930D uses a new type of lighting system that combines local dimming with edge lighting. Banding is also not an issue anymore, either. Are you sure you're looking at the right year?
And the better TV is the one that doesn't get returned for QA issues.
Combining the above with your faith in OLED puts you right square in the middle of "Oh, he's just wrong" territory. The Blue diode can indeed get better... By sacrificing it's color. To overcome this issue, they would need to find a new way to make the blue, and if it were possible in sure Sony would have done so to keep from burning $30K into their studio monitors.
It's not a single issue that leaves OLED a dead end, it's a number of them. Burn in, grayscale, half-life on the blue, cost of production... Pick one. The biggest issue, though, is the runt TV manufacturer that is LG is the only company really pushing it with any level of success. And their complete disregard for image quality in practice over image quality on a show floor is enough to put up the headstone for the technology. |
- Some sony 2016 models still suffer from banding.
- 930d? what of the 850d, 700d, 650d that that all don't have local dimming. You talk of the 930d as if that's the only model Sony makes....
- So you are basically saying it's not possible for oleds to get better? Cause Sony backed out of it? You know Sony also backed out of LCD tech too right?
- Would you consider Samsung a great display maker today? Would you have said the same thing 10yrs ago?
- you do know Panasonic is also making annoyed display now right?
