Azuren said:
TV salesman here. For quality, Sony still has Samsung beat. Many KU and KS models come back for green lines and OS corruption, where Sony's only ever come back for preferential reasons ("I need something bigger/smaller", "I decided to go with a cheaper brand", "my husband/wife said they ONLY want ____ brand")
And OLED is more accurately a dead end, just like Plasma was. |
Well.... I'm not gonna agree with jist cause you are a salesman. Yes I know Sony probably has everyone beat on quality, but their TVsalso suffer a lot from banding and uneven lighting. And most their recent models (especially with them going super thin which comes at a cost) don't come with local dimming zones which hurts their overall black levels.
Samsung has always had quality issues. But right now they make the better TV.
And I think you saying Oled is a dead end like plasma actually made me lose any form of respect I could have for you. Why is it a dead end? Cause of burn in? if you say that then you really must not know that every display tech in use today wasn't always as good as they are right now. It basically took LCD displays almost 12yrs to get to where they are now. And on all fronts except burn in and overall peak brightness OLED has them beat.
And the life span of the blue oled is only going to see improvemments with each nee iteration. Especially with LGs WRGB pixel structure. I could start going into all the different reasons why Oled is the future and all round better tech..... but that's not what this thread is about. There are just things oled can do and will do that LED displays never will. And I'll say just one of them, in time Lords will make having 100" plus displays economically feasible. But as I said that's another matter for a different kinda thread.
