pokoko said:
Somehow or another you missed the entire point of my first post. Perhaps you should go back and read it again. The bolded is exactly what I'm talking about. I showed you why it's completely possible--even probable--that Dr. Drew's show was cancelled because of low ratings and the new direction taken by the network, yet you call it "main stream media censorship" without showing any proof that it was. And, no, because one event happened first does not mean it caused the second event. As I said, if you sink your own credibility with that, why would anyone trust what you're saying? |
1) main stream media orgs don t tell people they are censoring the news- they go out of ther way to hide it- However the radio interview w Dr Drew was pulled down shortly after it aired-