Dunban67 said:
pokoko said:
See, things like this are why the knee-jerk conspiracy theory crowd has no credibility. They destroy it all on their own. Perhaps they might have the kernal of something but then they go acting like the world is a game and everything adds up to Foul Play (dun dun dun).
I mean, what do we know about this blantant "censorship"? We know that HLN, the network the show is on, is in the middle of a revamp. We know that Nancy Grace's show is also ending in October. And--this is kind of meaningful--we know that Dr. Drew's show was barely watched by anyone. "The show debuted in 2011, and has at times been the worst rated cable news program during the primetime hours, drawing less than 200,000 viewers." ( http://www.cinemablend.com/television/1549809/why-dr-drews-hln-show-was-cancelled )
Could the Clinton comments have helped push him out the door? Certainly. Is it possible, given the circumstances, that they had nothing to do with the decision, which HLN says was made weeks ago? That's definitely possible.
So, given that bit of exaggerated conclusion jumping right off the bat, why should I trust anything else you've said or any media you link?
|
like i said, do some research before you comment- the only "knee jerk response" is yours- The wikki llinks are not conspiricay- they are actual emails and information - you can say what you want about the contents of the wikki links but to say the leaks are a conspiracy is misinformation and shws you don t want to know more only less-
|
Alright, I'll bite, link me proof of that Dr. Drew was let go because of "more censorship" and not because his show pulled extremely low ratings.
