By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
Dunban67 said:

This is a video by the journalist at the Huffington Post that was fired for reporting on a video of Hillary Clinton having what looks to be a seizure of some sort- They also took the video down w no notice, reason etc-    I guess most of you know Dr Drew and his show was cancelled 8 days after a radio interview in whcih he questioned Hillary s health -  more censorship

The video is not re her health directly but on the Wiki leaks of offcial docs, emails etc Watch the video, do more research etc   None of it is surprising to me including the fact that most main stream media is not reporting on any of this, which is the most relevant news any news org could be reporting, researching etc-   This is not about who or who not to vote for-  this is abot the wikki leaks, the democratic nominee for Pres and serious government corruption that is being censored (blatantly)

https://youtu.be/qD7Q5sa_xHo

The description belwo in quotes is the actual You Tube  description for the above linked video

"Very dirty, Hillary Clinton. The second batch of DNC leak emails provided by Wikileaks are disturbing--proof of "pay to play" ambassadorship assignments, money in politics on overdrive, and of course DNC staffer Seth Rich lost his life shortly after (it is believed) he shared these documents with Wikileaks. Scary times for the country, yet the media isn't digging into Hillary Clinton's pay to play filth in the DNC leak emails. They're covering for her. Unacceptable."

See, things like this are why the knee-jerk conspiracy theory crowd has no credibility.  They destroy it all on their own.  Perhaps they might have the kernal of something but then they go acting like the world is a game and everything adds up to Foul Play (dun dun dun).

I mean, what do we know about this blantant "censorship"?  We know that HLN, the network the show is on, is in the middle of a revamp.  We know that Nancy Grace's show is also ending in October.  And--this is kind of meaningful--we know that Dr. Drew's show was barely watched by anyone.  "The show debuted in 2011, and has at times been the worst rated cable news program during the primetime hours, drawing less than 200,000 viewers."  ( http://www.cinemablend.com/television/1549809/why-dr-drews-hln-show-was-cancelled )

Could the Clinton comments have helped push him out the door?  Certainly.  Is it possible, given the circumstances, that they had nothing to do with the decision, which HLN says was made weeks ago?  That's definitely possible.  

So, given that bit of exaggerated conclusion jumping right off the bat, why should I trust anything else you've said or any media you link?

like i said, do some research before you comment-  the only "knee jerk response"  is yours-     The wikki llinks are not conspiricay-  they  are actual emails and information  -  you can say what you want about the contents of the wikki links but to say the leaks are a conspiracy is misinformation and shws you don t want to know more only less-