BlueFalcon said:
The funny part is probably half the people in this thread getting a 4K TV will never notice the difference between 1080p and 4K as it's a given that most of them are buying sub-84" 4K TVs. This is because the human eye cannot physically resolve that many pixels fully at a 9-10 feet viewing distance on smaller TVs. Great 4K marketing for TV manufacturers and Sony though. I'd say 75" is the bare minimum for a normal living room viewing distance to make 4K even worthwhile. The ability to run some games at 1080p 60Hz and HDR will be by far the bigger impact, but the PC does both of those better already.
https://www.cnet.com/news/why-ultra-hd-4k-tvs-are-still-stupid/ |
I believe this chart is accurate in test conditions, however I don't think it will be as black&white for the end-user watching for years. I'd say this is one of those, "your eyes can't see"-type of immortal claims which just won't die.
Who will see the benefits and who will not will vary greatly, because eyesight varies a lot. Type of content will be another major contributor how big the differences even can be.
It is not crucial whether our eyes can "physically resolve that many pixels fully", just partly will make the difference since human sight is not binary.
I cannot imagine toilet-free life.
Kebabs have a unique attribute compared to other consumables. To unlock this effect you need to wolf down a big ass kebab really fast, like under 10 minutes or so and wait for the effect to kick in. If done correctly your movements should feel unbelievably heavy to the point where you literally cannot move at all.
-Downtown Alanya Kebab magazine issue no.198
