By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Ok just my thoughts catching up with what's been posted today. I'll look over axum later and see what reason could exist for him dying, though I doubt it'll turn up anything fruitful.

 

1. zero's feeling about me being town because I didn't let him get lynched is a little misplaced. Just because I didn't let him die doesn't mean he should think I'm town. In fact, he knows how devious I am lol. I could easily be saving him to make him an ally, or to just make me look like a safe townie.

2. Mr.P's post is setting off all kinds of alarms. First of all, he seems to be intentionally misreading what I wrote yesterday, because I never casted shade on axum, I was actually casting shade on Mr.P for parroting what Axum said. I also am entirely unclear on what would make me think they were on the same team. The entire analysis seems like it has very little actual thought put into it. While I do agree that zero's analysis isn't very grounded, I can't get around this idea that is somewhat non-sequitorially dropped in there of a 2 mafia team and a killer who purposely made no attack last night.

This bothers me for a couple reasons. It seems entirely out of place, like, there was no real reason to suddenly assume multiple killers. It also makes the suspect pool very large, with 3 suspects out of 4 assuming he's leaving himself out of that pool purposely. It also bothers me that there is an assumption of 2 mafia. This specifically bothers me because let's just imagine for a second that Mr P is the silent killer. If he makes no kill himself, he then wakes up to see a kill. That would confirm a second party to a killer. But to the killer, it would seem too easy to just kill the mafia off in one night, which would lead to another assumption that there has to be more than one to be fair to the players.

3. I'd like some clarification about the 'alignment and looking for someone' comment.

HoS: Mr. P