By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WagnerPaiva said:
Normchacho said:

Uuuhhh....What?

1. Nope. It's an interesting balancing point politicaly for the US. Since we need to keep them happy (and safe) because of their strategic location and generally western beliefs, and having to stay freindly with the Islamic nations of the region (especially the Saudis) for their economic importance. But certainly not the most importnat place in the world.

2. What he did to Iran? You mean defuse an increasingly hostile situation with a very dangerous and potentially nuclear regime by joining up with half a dozen or so other nations to ease up on economic sanctions?

The deal is a disaster, it empowered Iran in the long run, putting all of us in risk

No it doesn't. Stop with your lies. Iran since its ascension has not been in a war except for Iraq which you US caused in the first place. And Iran is not as dangerous as you imply. There are no terrorist regimes in Iran and the country keeps to itself except for the shia sunni conflict which does not involve you anyway. It only involves Muslims. Also when president wants to go to war everyone including congress is all for it but when president wants peaceful negotiations everyone including congress is all against it. For example USA has been a part of almost every war in the 20th and 21st century but not part of most peaceful negotiations. What does that tell you about the US?



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also