Bodhesatva said:
Good answer! That's probably the better one. I just hate how people draw the line where it suits them. The Wii is less powerful, less customizable, and less feature rich than the PS3 and 360. The PS3 and 360 are less powerful, less customizable, and less feature rich than the PC. It's a very clear, distinct price vs. tech curve. The Wii is about 1/2 to 2/3 the cost of a PS3. If you're willing to spend more to get more graphics/tech, have fun. The PS3 is about 1/2 to 2/3 the cost of a PC. If you're willing to spend more to get more graphics/tech, have fun. Just stop cutting the curve off when it suits you. Include the whole curve, or none of it. |
Bod give up with your argument please , it's pretty apparent that PC's can be more powerfull than any console availible , it's also true that all consoles are really PC's.
But we're comparing largley closed systems whereas the PC is a largley open system ( also taking into account were not talking about a specific PC when we say "PC" but every single PC on the planet from the supercomputers to the dusty piece of shit computers ofcourse it's gonna win every time when compared to our home consoles.)
Crysis has the best graphics of any technological advice but the games a POS anyway and it's boring to play ( it seems the game was only created for the purposes of looking good).
Well done Crysis has the best graphics , now let's continue comparing consoles ( the whole point of this thread)
