tokilamockingbrd said:
by women's rights do you mean abortion? I honestly think in a 200 years we will look back at abortion as the sin of our time much like we look at slavery as a major sin from 200 years before us. Our decendents will judge us for it, buildings will have to be renamed at university because it was named after a known abortion support. Some people will argue it was a nessessity of the time to control population growth, but will still condemn the means.
Prophet Tokila has spoken. |
Most people at least think abortion should be available in some situations regardless of calling themselfs pro-life or pro-choice. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx
He has signed every bill related to abortion that has hit his desk. His personal beliefs have bounced between all three (abortion shouldn't ever be allowed, allowed for rape/incest, and abortion should only be allowed in case the mother's life is at danger) back and forth multiple times over the past 8 years. With many sighting it really wouldn't matter, he'd sign the bill regardless of the exceptions it gave if it just hit his desk.
"He has decimated access to abortion: In March 2016, Gov. Pence signed a measure prohibiting women from obtaining an abortion because of the race, gender, or disability of the fetus, making Indiana only the second state in the nation to do this."
On top of all that it required one to bury or cremate fetuses. Good thing it was blocked by a federal judge.
I would also like to point out that is the only reply you gave without even hitting on his signing of RNRA.
