Fisrt batches of NG2 review out.

[Strategyking92]

PooperScooper said:

Strategyking92 said:

PooperScooper said:

Just more excuses. 66 is in the same league as 56 and 58.

Unless you are saying that a 100% and a 92% game aren't

Obviously the 92% game is crap right...

10 point diff.

13 point difference, and a

8 point difference.

well, you can't compare a score of 60 to a score of 70 can you? you can't compare a score of 70 to 83 can you? and you can't compare a score of 62 to a score of 70?  Can you? can you?????

obvious those games suck so much harder.

The way I see it is after a certain point you can just clump the titles into on category "shit" Shadowrun was shit just like Haze and Lair. I start classifying that point right after 70%

Maybe if reviewers actually used the grading system correctly then it wouldn't be after 70. but in todays reviews 70 is considered a bad game.

I totally agree, but I just used it as an example. IF it were a 70% and it still had the grade diff. of 8-13%, one would be considered shit and the other wouldn't.  One game came alot closer to not being shit though.

Anyway, I consider 70% good, which is why i'm glad viking got a 70% av. rating.