Final-Fan said:
Hello, fatslob. For a while I figured you were just taking your time answering my question, but I am beginning to worry that you have abandoned this conversation without justifying your position or even saying anything at all in reply, as if the position you took was indefensible. Otherwise, what reason would there be to drop the conversation completely without warning?
To remind you what the discussion was: you claimed that Trump is not at fault for lying to those people in those letters (about Trump University) because he never made a legal contract with them. ("In business, a man's word is of no guarantees. Only the legal contract matters.") I will ask you again, if Trump's promises are worthless except in the context of a binding legal document, what binding legal document exists to assure us that Trump has any intention whatsoever of doing any of the things he has promised you he would do? If he's made a career out of swindling the American public as a businessman, why should we trust that he's not going to swindle the American public as a politician? Maybe he'd be happy to let ISIS through immigration for $10,000 per terrorist, cash only. As long as he could find a constitutional way to do it. He doesn't want to build a wall, and if he did he wouldn't make Mexico pay for it. He'd make New Mexico pay for it, and tell us he didn't specify "which Mexico" he was talking about.
You had mentioned that the constitution was a legal contract, which I suppose it is, but I don't really see how it's relevant to this situation. He pretty much has to stay away from bribery, treason, etc.
|
I'm sorry I'll get back to you, I shouldn't even be on here when I've got educational matters to attend to ...
