Why did Hillary say that? What was she thinking?

[LordTheNightKnight]

halogamer1989 said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

halogamer1989 said:

Aj_habfan said:
She's done anyway. Obama vs McCain, I think we already know who will win what.

McCain. (Operation Chaos has just begun. 28% of Clinton voters will switch sides in Nov. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/26/dems.switch.poll/index.html) Now that's REAL change Barack.

PS Hitler gave good speeches too.

Man, it's been a while since I saw Godwin's Law on this site.

I could put that a better way. Oratory isn't really a sign of leadership. A lot of great leaders were great orators, but they also showed leadership.

If oratory is a, leadership is b, and leaders are c, then a=/=b fallacy= If c = a then c = b. Therefore c does not = a for b is a separate variable--a=/=b.

That was pretty much what I meant. I think you thought I meant the opposite.

Lord your issuance of Godwin's law is futile at best.

How is it futile. You wrote "Hitler". That's not "futile", that's a fact. Godwin's Law only states that Hitler or nazis would be mentioned. Anything else is just additions.

Besides, Obama's equation for change is capitalist democracy to socialist democracy. I would rather take the former. Gov't healthcare, gov't programs xInf. Feasible, no. Practical, no. Appealing in a speech, yes.

You seem to think I was supporting Obama's speech over action. If you had read my comment properly, you would know I was not.