By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vinther1991 said:

No he is not legally allowed to diagnose anyone with parkinson. Parkinson is a disease with a lot of symptomes, but non that are distintive to the disease. Even people who have many of the symptomes have to go to a neurologist, who will do blodtests and CT/MR-scannings and sometimes DAT-scanning.

He might claim he doesn't diagnose her, but he says the evidence is clear that she has advanced parkinson disease. His understanding of the word evidence is really scary. No doctor should take such vague indications as evidence. I wouldn't want him as a doctor, wonder what diagnosis he would give me, I'm a little thirsty sometimes and sometimes I have to pee frequently. Solid evidence for diabetes! And I also wouldn't want a doctor who thinks it's "odd" that someone who has fainted doesn't have reflexes.

Yes a chain-smoker who coughs a lot might have bronchitis and should have a doctor examine him/her. But it could be so many other things, it might not even be a disease. Suggesting a person should have an examination due to a couple of minor symptomes is one thing claiming there is CLEAR EVIDENCE for parkinson due to some minor symptomes is something completely different.

None of this is distinctive to parkinson at all. I've done both several times.

You know who else might have Parkinson? Well Donald Trump has a lot of weird facial expressions and mood swings, that's also Parkinson symptomes...

If anything Hillary Clinton might be stressed, campaigning for presidency is an extremely tough program, that alone can actually explain most of her not so unusual behavior.

But seriously, her having Parkinson is nothing but a conspiracy theory on the same level as 9/11 being an inside job, holocaust being a lie and the moon landing being fake. I can only laugh at it, but a lot of people seem to believe that stuff, which worries me quite a bit actually.

I am not above admitting that I bought into some BS I was fed. I am never above admitting I am wrong, let alone admitting that I am wrong to suspect something. 

Two things in particular raised my eye brows, her chronic cough and this video here, she paused for less than 3 seconds before her doctor ran towards her before it got bizarre, that's a head scratcher. How did he expect her to freeze before it happened?

I don't believe 9/11 was an inside job, I am not a holocaust denier, and I believe Americans landed on the moon. I never said I believed she had parkinson, and lumping me with people who believe 9/11 is a bit unfair to be honest.

She is a 68 year old woman, suggesting something might be wrong with her health based on some public incidents isn't nearly as stupid as believing 9/11 was an inside job.

Why is everyone telling me to pay more attention to Trump? I don't want that guy anywhere near the Iron Throne. I hope Hillary gets back on her feet soon enough, I hope nothing is wrong with her, I will be happy to admit I was fool enough to believe some youtube video that fed me ridiculous BS, I don't find suggesting she has some sort of a neurological disorder for someone her age is outrageous now, may be I will tomorrow? rest assured that I'll be here first to admit it.