When did you EVER buy a 4K Blu-ray Film?

[tinfamous12]

Bandorr said:

tinfamous12 said:

 

Nope, not simple as that.

PS3 was an intro console, they expected all PS2 players to migrate towards it at a rediculous price right away. This is an ENTIRELY different situation, it's a mid-gen bump. It's meant to be the top of the line 4K capable console and the top of the line PS4. Sony has the option for those who want a cheaper console, we call that the PS4 Slim model. And as you can see by the outrage from gamers, they wanted a top of the line 4K console...Sony did not deliver that on any front.

Simple huh?

"outrage from gamers" because they can't play physical 4K DVD movies? That seems a bit funny doesn't it? Like people being mad a new car can't hold JUMBO cups and you have to settle for just regular ones.

Looking at the poll almost three times as many people prefer it to be $399 and no 4k blu-ray.

Looking at Amazon you know what I see under number 1?

The people outraged are the people that only wanted to spend "a little" extra to get a player. They rather have payed $500 for both instead of $400 for one and $300 for another.

Just like people would have been outraged if the console cost $500 and they were paying $100 more for something they don't want.

So yes it is very simple. People complain because they like to complain. There would have been complaints no matter what.

Are you really citing a poll and Amazon's video game chart as sources? Thats my only question. I've already said my piece.