CGI-Quality said:
No matter what criteria you use, the idea is the same (or similar enough to work, here). Mid-gen changes/upgrades are not new and this is no different (the 32-bit era always comes to mind as the closest to waht this gen is seeing). Granted, this certainly is a different flavor, but the same principle and rules apply. The one main difference is Microsoft and Sony's narratives tagged to these upcoming machines. One sees the end of gens, while the calls it what it is - a mid-gen upgrade. Frankly, I think Microsoft should skip the whole "Scorpio" thing and jump fully into the 9th generation (meaning - considerably more than a 6TF console). That way, it would have been 4 years since the X1's release and they could get a good jump start on Sony (much like what helped the 360 see its early successes). |
Yeah, I don't think we dissagree. Its an evolution more than a revolution. Although I think the difference in Sony and MS semantics is reflective of their intentions. I should have really responded to Shadow980 who's statement I was really responding to
"Also, they're not going to be part of a new normal, I don't care what some people's crystal balls are telling them. Odds are, they're going to be one-off things, likely brought about by VR and 4K, things that the the base-model PS4 & XBO (which were not as big of a jump in power as previous generations) couldn't do. Console cycles exist for very good reasons, and attempting to disrupt that could have hugely negative effects on the industry. There's no point in radical shifts in the status quo when the status quo is still healthy. Don't fix what isn't broken."
The mere existence of a mid gen update as powerful as Scorpio is in itself a disruption to the console cycle and throws into question the significane of an Xbox2 (how much more power can it offer?)....and I agree with you that Microsoft should skip Scorpio and release the Xbox1's successor/ the PS5's competitor.







