By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
DonFerrari said:

And the phalacy that socialism worked or help people is also throw, but never close to be even proved, but since you won't discuss it no problem.

It works in reality. At some point in time someone had to start to build the wealth, it can take one or multiple generations for it to happen, and in a lot of cases in some generations it vanishes a lot. Look at most bilionaires and bigger companies, most of them are far young and caming from scratch, not handled gen over gen.

They were paid to work and could leave at any moment. Why didn't you handled your house back to the people that constructed it since you seem to believe it's theirs.

Implying the majority of wealth is not inherited is a fallacy.

Implying social mobility is widespread is fallacy.

Implying a company as the means of pruduction is the same as a house is just stupid.

Any proof of wealth being frozen in time?

You should talk to Dilma and PT because they are very keen on defending their party moved most of the poor to the middle class.

Have the employees bought the equipments? Have they been forced or worked for free? Have they paid for the building? No... so the analogy is pretty similar.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."