WolfpackN64 said:
Implying the majority of wealth is not inherited is a fallacy. Implying social mobility is widespread is fallacy. Implying a company as the means of pruduction is the same as a house is just stupid. |
Any proof of wealth being frozen in time?
You should talk to Dilma and PT because they are very keen on defending their party moved most of the poor to the middle class.
Have the employees bought the equipments? Have they been forced or worked for free? Have they paid for the building? No... so the analogy is pretty similar.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







