Pemalite said:
Jigsawx1 said:
then try BO2 please on an athlon @2 x 2,8 ghz and a 100 euro graphiccard from 2005 (ati radeon 9600 256m memory) with 2 gb ddr2 ram. This it is what you got in 2005 for 400-500 euro. The Xbox 360 was stronger than that ok but you could play games for 10 years in 720 p and Cod BO2 and Ghosts with 60 fps. This is not because the hardware was so ultra strong, you could play it because of optimsation.
|
No. Because other than a Phenom 2 x6 I have no AMD systems on hand and it's only a dual-core.
But try running Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare on your 2005 console, oh wait, you can't. You never will, but a Quad Core PC on the other hand from 2006 will.
Hows about Battlefield 1? Nope. Not that either.
Halo Wars 2? Nope. You can't.
Mass Effect: Andromeda? Not that either.
Frostbite is extremely well optimized on PC, even 10 year old CPU's handle it just fine, Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Battlefield: Hardline, Dragon Age: Inquisiton, Mirrors Edge have shown to scale extremely well and look almost a generation ahead on a 10+ year old CPU relative to the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3.
I could probably elaborate on that "Optimization" bizzo you proclaim but I would assume you would ignore it anyway. - Let's just say, that PC hardware also get's optimizations over it's life span.
Jigsawx1 said:
It is nice that you can play everthing with the same processor for 10 years and only change the graphiccard all 3-4 years. but then you payed 1500 -2000 euro and not 400.
|
Er. Did you forget the PC has free online? Cheaper Accessories? Cheaper games? All said and told, if you have a large games library you save money on the PC over the long term compared to console, go do the math.
I also don't need multiple PC's to play multiple generations of games, I can still run every single game, even one's released 30 years ago, today.
Jigsawx1 said:
And a game like Total war Rome 2 or Total War Attlia dont run smooth on an core 2 quad so you have to change it after 5 years.
please ask some people who are producing videogames and they will tell you that you get more out of a console than a pc with same hardware, for the same graphics on console and pc you need a better pc than the console hardware is.
|
Total War Rome 2 runs fine on my Core 2 Quad.
In-fact, my Core 2 Quad out-benches most stock AMD systems except for the faster 8-core chips.
My 5 year old Core i7 3930K can run Total War Rome 2 multiple times at once without breaking a sweat, it also out-benches the modern 6-core chips (Broadwell-E) though.
Since the Core 2 Quad era, there has been less of a need to upgrade your hardware as often, that occured again with Sandy Bridge.
It's not unusual for people to hang onto a PC for half a decade or more because it can simply handle everything just fine.
Lauster said:
So you (don't) answer by asking another question and bringing points that are off topic from what he said.
|
It's called taking his question, placing it in an example, whilst asking another question in succession.
I have laid it out fine for you to make the connection from point A to point B.
|
