So the Scorpio....

[Pemalite]

Jigsawx1 said:

have you tried to play CoD BO2 on a 400euro pc hardware from 2005? It dont works and it dont works with best pc hardware you could buy at this time so they get more out of it as it is normal for a pc. Also you can see that every year, CoD (for example) looks better year after year on XOne Ghost < Cod AW < BO3 and its the same hardware all the time. So its different if make a game for pc or consoles, because on consoles you can optimize your game for 1 Hardware.

that dont mea that consoles are 2x fatser then pc pendants but you can get more out of it as on a normal windows pc

Have you tried to play Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare? Your 400euro Console from 2005 can't do it as it's never going to be released on it. Like ever.

Hows about 4k? 5k? Or 7680x1600? Or hows about even 11,520x2160? Still not enough? What about 11,520x4320?
Can you have the same levels of shadowing, lighting, geometry, framerate (120fps/144fps), resolution, texture filtering and more?

If you bought a Core 2 Quad PC released in 2006 with 8Gb DDR2/DDR3 Ram, all you would need is the occasional GPU upgrade which is a cost that is offset by the free online and cheaper games.
Then that Core 2 Quad PC that is 10 years old will still be capable of playing the next CoD game, next year. Can your console do that? No? Why is that? Because it's been left behind in the past unable to play the latest games due to it's technical inadequacy.

How do I know this? Because I also own a Core 2 Quad PC and I am well versed on it's capabilities having extensively tested it with games out of sheer curiosity. - That is in conjunction with my other rigs.

Funny how you can't win the power argument, so you shift the goal post to focus on price though. - The transition into the new generation of consoles has proven how well a PC can keep on going through this console generation transition whilst your old console falls into obscurity.