| Machiavellian said: I want to make sure I understand your position here. You do not care about transparency for someone going for the ofiice of POTUS. You are happy with whatever they tell you and do not care if what they say is true or not. Trump has made claims and positioned his candancy on those claims. He has said he contributed alot to charities, he has stated his net worth and he has championed in his own econmic plan to give even more tax breaks to the rich. Just by that alone he should easily come clean just like 40 years of people who were serious about becoming president and release his returns. What we have found out through the years is that the people who usually make a big issue to release those returns has the most to hide. What I see from you is a lot of excuses but no real reason why he should not release his return just like everyone who was serious about going for POTUS has done. Using Ross Perot in your arguments was another deflection since we know how that went down. I already have an opinion what is there in Trump returns and no I do not believe there is any smoking gun that will change anyone who has decided to vote for him. Instead, I find it interesting that anyone would just let him off the hook and give excuses for him to not release his returns when he said himself he would. No, Wikileaks having nothing on Trumps mean that they have either not put any real effort into getting anything, they have no interest or there isn't anything. There could be many reason why they do or do not have anything but using them as the only sol source if there is any nefarious things Trump has done is basically ignoring the body of stuff you can easily search for on the net. No person who is serious about doing any real research on any of these people only look at one source of info. |
I care about transparency but I also care about personal privacy too. My worries aren't lies, my worries are nefarious plans plotted behind the public.
@Bold Really ? Don't just say it, prove it with past history in the last 40 years otherwise you have no case and show what was specifically so diabolical that the presidential candidates were hiding in their tax returns ...
I'm not making excuses, you're just creating a red herring. I have a question for you, is it more important to keep tabs on a single citizen rather than what a government is doing ?
No other leading whistleblowers have called out Trump so it's not only wikileaks that has no information on him but everyone else is empty too ...
