By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
CGI-Quality said:

The entire purpose of showing that model (and essentially why this thread exists in the first place) wasn't for anything but graphical purposes, not attractiveness/beauty. Besides, it's an incomplete version of the character.

I confess I am somehwat ignorant of the technology involved, but holy crap, that's one ugly motherfucker. All the graphical bells and whistles in the world aren't much help if the underlying design work is poor, and I sure as hell hope the standard for a "next gen" human looks a lot better than that. Even as someone who is satisfied with Wii U graphics and still enjoys Wii games in glorious SD, I cringed looking at that model.

Surely there's a better example?

You do know that there are ugly people in world right? So it's quite possible that this guy have a real world equivalent.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."