By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:

Let me ask you fatslob exactly why you think Trump does not bring his own brand of corruption to the office.  You seem to easily criticize HC for her corruption but then again seem to give a pass to the obvious corruption Trump has done within his own business.  From Trump University to Trump Institute.  This link shows exactly the type of promise big but not deliver Trump has done for years in his business.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/how-trump-broke-his-promise-fund-major-charitable-foundation

This is not some isolated incident as I have found multiple such deals where Trump has promised to do something even draw up contracts and when it’s time to pay up does not deliver or just plain refuse do honor the agreements and tell the people to sue him.

I cannot understand your stance in one breath talking about all the corruption HC has done but seem to totally ignore the same if not worst corruption Trump has done as well.  How can you state you are for getting rid of this type of corruption in our government but then is willing to just substitute another one but only difference is this one is the biggest con man out of the bunch.

I don't think Trump will entirely subdue corruption in the office. I criticize Clinton's corruption because she's granted higher power than a citizen like Trump is and she also decides to be A LOT less transparent about it. LOL, she was desperate enough to avoid persecution by pinning her email fiasco on someone else. Just goes to show you how much of a coward she can be and that's not a favourable trait from a leader no matter how anyone spins it. FYI, I dislike for profit education and Trump University is no different but that's the customer's fault for getting into their own shenanigans if they don't research the crap they buy ... 

As for the link, the judges ruled that no legally binding contract was formed so that's the plaintiffs fault for not legally securing their own claimed property ... 

Trump couldn't have ever been corrupt at least not in the political sense according to Wikipedia because his power as a regular citizen means that he's practically infallible to such accusations currently whereas Clinton on the other hand was a senator for eight years and the secretary of services for four years who was currying favours for the Clinton Foundation donors ... 

I don't know if I am totally getting rid of corruption because of how big the government already is but I'm willing to pick a clean slate over a scarred one and I especially respect our power in a democracy to replace the scourge or defecates who's interests are funded by others. Trump maybe a con artist for all I know but Clinton is a fucking shyster that continues to get a free pass ...