| stranne said: Good work on the graphs, Sqrl. But wouldn't it be possible to use the most current VGC data and move the VGC part further to the right? |
The problem at that point is in extrapolating what their predictions are. Since the information they give us is only precise to the calendar year end I can only be true to their prediction from those points. Any representation that used the latest VGC data would have to use some method for filling in what we don't/can't know with the information we have.
Or in short, nope 
Since you brought it up though, the fact that they make this prediction so far into the future is really only an invitation to be proven wrong. I don't think you can truly use analysis to make meaningful predictions beyond at most 2 years in this market, particularly when that prediction prescribes massive change as suddenly as this one does. Thats not to say analysis is innaccurate, but if you want reasonable certainty to within a reasonable range of accuracy then you have to accept that analysis has its restrictions, not the least of which is how far into the future you can predict. CNET is either unaware of this restriction or they don't care for reasonability in their analyses.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
