By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
pokoko said:

It certainly is not.  Don't be silly.  That would be like saying, "stop being obnoxious or I'll call the police."  You're grossly exaggerating.  Because I find something to be annoying or suggest what I feel is a better way does not mean that I want the original to be moderated.  You're trying to create a false dichotomy and it's very obvious that you're reaching.

Still, it's going to be interesting to see if you practice what you preach.

I don't have the delusion that you will admit anything when I call you out on something. Pushing you around a bit and seeing what you come up with, that's the reasonable expectation to have.

I am pretty good at practicing what I preach, because I am fully aware that you will take any chance to take a dig at me. Covert attacks are your speciality. But you don't get many of those chances, and even when you see a chance, it doesn't mean it will work. Like two weeks ago when your attempt was called stupid by the mod team. You have to mess up pretty badly in order to get publicly slammed by a mod in such a blunt manner.

Mr. Kettle, Mr. Pot is on line 1.  I mean, that's what this is, isn't it?  You reaching for an attack, even though the two situations are very different, and over-extending yourself badly?  And now following it up childishly when you realize that you've made a mistake?  

Though I suppose that you might not realize the two situations are different, as hard to believe as that seems.  Should we review for your sake?  The first event was me disagreeing with the idea that only fans of a particular console can post general bad news about it or they'll face moderation.  This time, I suggested that the forums would be less cluttered if someone were to consolidate their multiple game-specific threads, with absolutely no call for moderation.

The difference is clear.  Even a blind person--or a zealot--can see that.