By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
pokoko said:

You're saying that there is nothing between "should be moderated" and "should not be moderated" and you won't complain about anything that does not fall into the "should be moderated" column?  Interesting.  

No.

When you say someone should collect all their posts about a certain subject in one single thread and then tell a moderator that separate threads bring the forum to a lower level, it's certainly an implicit request that a certain member's thread creation rights should be limited (which is moderation, even if there are no conventional warnings and bans handed out; it's essentially a ban of certain threads for a certain member). If you then try to twist your way out by saying that you haven't been asking for moderation in order to not have agree with me on something, then you shouldn't have made those posts to begin with.

It certainly is not.  Don't be silly.  That would be like saying, "stop being obnoxious or I'll call the police."  You're grossly exaggerating.  Because I find something to be annoying or suggest what I feel is a better way does not mean that I want the original to be moderated.  You're trying to create a false dichotomy and it's very obvious that you're reaching.

Still, it's going to be interesting to see if you practice what you preach.