BraLoD said:
oniyide said:
whats logical is not charging 60 bucks for a game that shouldnt cost near that much
|
Can you tell me why it should not be charged 60 bucks? It's definitely bigger than a lot of stuff that goes well with being charged 60 bucks.
What is logical it to review a game solely based on it and not on external factors. Like giving them an easy 10 because it was a small team that accomplished something, or giving it a 2 because it was heavily marketed and was short, or giving it a 6 because you wanted something the game never aimed at and then is obviously not pushing, or giving it a 10 when the games is filled with technical problems, or give it a 10 because it comes from a famous brand, etc.
Price, marketing or brand should not even come close to be a factor to a game review.
|
if its big and there is nothing to do or you have to do the same things over and over again, whats the point? If being big is the only thing the game has going for it, thats a problem...for me at least. If thats your thing, have at it.
Price def should be a factor because for most people it IS a factor. So why not talk about it?