Savage IGN review (No Man's Sky)

[Nautilus]

Jumpin said:

Nautilus said:
I would say it is harsh, not Savage.But its completely fair.And to be honest, the way he says and presents his arguments, it seems like this game was going to be scored either 3 or 4, not 6.Just the impression I got reading/seeing the review.

They're not really known for harsh review scores except that time they thought Tactics Ogre was a Final Fantasy Tactics ripoff. A 6/10 on IGN is the same as a 3 or 4.

Yeah I know.But I think that is true for most reviewers nowadays though.They dont really use the 1-10 scale, and more of a 5-10.Either because they are afraid of the backlash for giving a game(when it deserves) a really low score of 4 for example, or just because they just cant give an honest score because they got acoustomed to this.(before someone jump on me for this comment, it is not aimed at No mans Sky, but games that are reviewed in general)

One of the few reviewers that i personally feel like gives the score that it really means is Jim Sterling.But again, just my opinion.