Currently Online 
| fatslob-:O said: Still see that your not admitting to your lies ... That's YOUR misrepresentation of logic ... Edit: Oh well, I quit. This is mission accomplished for me anyway for me whether you'll admit to your own lies or not ... And if you don't like the technicallity aspects of my arguments well then ...
|
If you don't think he suggested that, why'd you spend so much time arguing that it was legal XD Maybe that should have been your argument from the beginning? Seems like you are, dare I say, moving the goal posts?
What I said was
"The Chinese exclusion act didn't ban immigration by religious belief. Chinese is not a religious belief. And I wasn't talking about Drumpf's suggestion of banning Muslim immigration, which is something I have conflicted feelings about. I was talking about him saying we should consider a registry for muslims in the US. That's something much different and much more horrifying. That's straight up nazi tactics. And I don't mean like "oh I hate him so I'll call him a Nazi" I mean it's literally one of the things nazis did. And that is a straight up violation of the 14th amendment which does not apply to Chinese people in China, but does apply to Muslim people in the US. " (I should have said first amendment, not 14th).
And did Drumpf say we should consider a registry for muslims in the US? Yes, he absolutely did.
"Let's hear it directly from you," said host Kimberly Guilfoyle. "Would President Donald Drumpf support a full Muslim database?"
"Basically the suggestion was made and (it’s) certainly something we should start thinking about," Drumpf said, repeating that the reporter presented the idea. "But what I want is a watch list. I want surveillance programs. Obviously, there are a lot of problems. … But, certainly, I would want to have a database for the refugees, for the Syrian refugees that are coming in because nobody knows where they're coming from."
and
"Do you think we might need to register Muslims in some type of database, or note their religion on their ID?"
Drumpf responded, "We’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely. We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully."
and
"Should there be a database or system that tracks Muslims in this country?"
Trump: "There should be a lot of systems,. Beyond databases. I mean, we should have a lot of systems."
and
You did stir up a controversy with those comments over the database. Let's try to clear that up. Are you unequivocally now ruling out a database on all Muslims?"
Trump: "No, not at all,"
That's several times he was asked about a registry for muslims. He said we should start thinking about it. Meaning we should consider it. He said he wouldn't rule it out. If you don't rule it out, you're considering it. Try doing a little research before calling bullshit.
And I also see you have nothing to say about his clear statement that anchor babies are not ctizens. He did say it four times after all, so I'd think you'd admit you were wrong on that one.
But yeah, you caught me using the wrong word once. A winner is you. 
