fatslob-:O said:
The president ALONE can't change it but that doesn't mean he can't influence congress or it's own citizens to support that vision ...
Now your just lying, "But, arguing that we violate the first amendment by putting Muslims on a registry is objectively bad presidenting." ... LEARN WHEN TO CONCEDE!
My point still stands, " And no commanding the military does not mean you HAVE to know what the fuck is going on " ...
Again, another lie. These are the two things he's said, "End birthright citizenship", "Bill, I don't think they have American Citizenship" ... NOT ONCE AND I MEAN NOT ONCE did he utter these words together, "Deport ancher babies" or even "Assassinate Clinton" ...
I'm not coherrent because your blinded in your own anger, it's as simple as that ... I think this has gone far enough. It's pretty clear that you don't intend to keep this real looking at how you've expressed your interolance which severely affects your ability to have a nonpartisan discussion or be open to other viewpoints ... I quit, you win. Feel better now, buddy ? /s |
The president ALONE can't change it but that doesn't mean he can't influence congress or it's own citizens to support that vision ...
Still entirely irrelevant.
Now your just lying, "But, arguing that we violate the first amendment by putting Muslims on a registry is objectively bad presidenting." ...
LEARN WHEN TO CONCEDE!
Learn what a registry is. Then learn to read. After that, come back and show me where I mentioned anything about immigration in that sentence. I already explained I was talking about a registry of muslims in the US.
My point still stands, " And no commanding the military does not mean you HAVE to know what the fuck is going on " ...
To effectively command the military you have to know what the fuck is going on, and I made this distinction several times.
You can command the military without knowing what the fuck is going on in the same sense that you can play Mario without the use of the A button, perform open heart surgery without anesthesia, or play quarterback without throwing the ball.
In the realm of intelligent conversation, we realise that when we talk about what we need to do a job, we talk about doing it effectively. Whenever you want to stop playing dumb and join me in this realm, you're welcome to.
Again, another lie. These are the two things he's said, "End birthright citizenship", "Bill, I don't think they have American Citizenship" ...
NOT ONCE AND I MEAN NOT ONCE did he utter these words together, "Deport ancher babies" or even "Assassinate Clinton" ...
If you're going to deport anyone without citizenship, and you're saying a certain group of people doesn't have citizenship, you're going to deport them. This is simple reasoning and logic. Do you posess the ability to examine words in anything but the strictest literal sense? Trump didn't seem to argue that this isn't what he meant, so I'm not sure what your issue is.
I'm not coherrent because your blinded in your own anger, it's as simple as that ... 
No, you're incoherent because you lack the ability to make simple inferences, understand context, spell words correctly, use punctuation appropriately, or follow a train of thought. I assure you, I'm not particularly angry at the moment. You could have simply taken this opportunity to clarify what you meant, or at least write it with proper grammar, but you chose not to.
I think this has gone far enough. It's pretty clear that you don't intend to keep this real looking at how you've expressed your interolance which severely affects your ability to have a nonpartisan discussion or be open to other viewpoints ...
No, I haven't. There is a difference between hating someone and being intolerant. I'm quite capable of conversation. I'd prefer you actually address what I said instead of making ad hominem attacks about my abilities. My abilities are quite strong.
I quit, you win. Feel better now, buddy ? /s
I feel better insomuch as I won't have to deal with this nonense anymore. But it is a bit irksome that you are simply saying "oh you're too intolerant to understand" to avoid actually defending what you said. Earlier, I was able to have an actual exchange of ideas with someone, where we wound up finding common ground. I'd much have preferred that.
