By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
Rpruett said:
Trump is fantastic and while some people feel he 'may' be all of these things. Clinton is factually a corrupt, fraud and has been for 30 years of her career. Scandal and Clinton are synonyms.

Ask any question you have of Trump and reflect it back onto Clinton. You'll find that Clinton is the worse of the two, consistently. Take every scandal generated by the media about Trump and you'll find similar things other politicians did that weren't considered a scandal. Take policy positions that Trump/Sanders/etc have had that people like and watch Clinton pander and suddenly pretend to start taking those same positions.

Trump is Pro-America. Hillary is Pro-Globalism. It really boils down to that.

lol, Trump will be globalist too. Capitalism is globalism (what do you think was the point of the Cold War?), anyone who thinks a president can just engage in isolationist policy has no idea how business works in the year 2016. Half the shit Trump says, he knows is bullshit, he will bail out on those proposals (like building a wall), unfortunately for him right now he's getting his ass pretty soundly whupped by Hilary in the polls so we probably will never know. 

Capitalism isn't globalism. Maybe unfettered, absolute global capitalism would be that,  do you think that's what we have now? We as a country and as a world aren't close to that level of Capitalism. Can you just make your product in the United States and sell it on the shelves of France, with no issue?

When has anybody, I mean anybody suggested isolationist policy?  Companies existing in the United States and taking all of the benefits that being based in the United States provides and then subsequently offshoring their work and bringing your goods back into the United States isn't benefitting anybody but the companies profit margins.  There is a reason that companies keep posting record breaking profit, while the income disparity, gap and amount of available jobs continues to dwindle in the US.  

There is no reason why we should allow US companies to continue to move their operations outside the country and bring their products into the country without some form of penalty or punishment.  Ford moving to Mexico is a prime example of how utterly stupid and negative these trade agreements have become.

How much trade imbalance the United States has acquired over the past 20 years and explain to me,  how that has benefit the United States and it's citizens.   Connect the trade imbalance with Mexico and the passage of NAFTA.   Explain to me, how NAFTA has benefit anybody but the actual company moving across the border.(from a business perspective).  It hasn't,  it's hurt both countries economies in different ways.