By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Well... Considering the game isn't out yet and we havn't played it, the refund still works loll. It shouldn't take more than 1 hour to notice performance issues really. You start the game, it derps, refund, they fix performance problems, get it on sale, profit.

Well instant perf issues I can totally get behind and understand. I was going more with those bugs that can occur later on. Kinda like with Fallout 4, some people had no bugs until 20 hours into their game, some had bugs straight from the start, those at the start of course would be valid for that refund, those past 20 hrs not so much =P.

I guess if you don't get issues within the first few hrs then you could be fine for 100, anything past 5 would mean you're stuck with it until they sort out said bugs (which I imagine will be their go to thing upon release).

Thats true but 20 hours of playing is quite a lot of playtime to issue a refund really. If steam made it so users can refund games after playing that long, most people would just abuse the system since most games out there are bearly 10 hours. Heck, considering the amount of indie games on steam that barely make it 3 hours, I think it would be a giant issue. So to me it makes sense why they did it for two hours but extreme cases should be the exception of course like Batman was.

Bugs here and there are to be expected of every game, specially open world games. Just as long as it doesn't format ur pc or rape the save file, I think it should be fine.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850