| Soundwave said: Again this is bullshit, he didn't get the votes. Period. End of story. There's nothing worse than a sore loser. If Hilary could manipulate votes like that here's a genius theory ... why didn't she do it in 2008? That was much, much closer, she lost to Obama by basically a hair. This contest? Wasn't even close. Even if she somehow manipulated "half" that, she still wins by like 2 million. Winning is winning. You don't give the guy who came in second at the Olympics a gold too because he was only a second behind. She lost in 2008 and won in 2016 ... fair is fair. Quite frankly good on her for sticking with it, that loss in 2008 would've crushed many people. Shows character to pick yourself up and after that, dust yourself off, and try again. |
So you excuse the DNC for undermining democracy ?
At this point I have no doubt that Clinton supporters do not have higher standards than any other supporters of their respective candidates when they think it's okay for an election to be rigged along with instilling power to an individual who's PROVEN to be corrupt ...
God help us all when she gets elected cause that just signals that it's perfectly fine for the government to poison the democratic process and that we don't even fucking deserve to have a democracy and instead let the parties assign their damn puppets so heck the DNC may as well just aim for an equivalent of a North korean dictator for the so called "next" election ...
