Has Bethesda ruined the Fallout series (and my big rant!)?

[Chazore]

Pemalite said:

I was talking graphically of course. I tried replaying Fallout 3 about a year ago and wanted to poke my eyes out. Even mods couldn't really pull it up enough.
Fallout 4 wasn't graphically pleasing either.
New Vegas as it used the same engine as Fallout 3 was a horrible looking title even on it's launch, games had moved past that level and that hurt the experience in my opinion.

I am a fan of the Genre, but I am probably a little more picky with games in general than most people... If the game doesn't grab me and I get bored I tend to move onto another game.

Gamebryo is like 14 years old. They claim to be going with an "improved" creation engine, but deep down it is still gamebryo and the past few Fallout/ES games show that they are aging too fast and not looking on par with other games that come out the same eyar. Fallout 4's reveal left a lot to be desired for me due to the visuals already looking dated. The game still has issues loading in some textures to a point where I had to make a few tweaks just to get some of them to load up like ther est of the world, didn't make them look any better though. Also the game is heavily CPU bound which doesn't help things either since unlocking the FPS will screw up the game physics entirely. Also having faster RAM apparently helps with getting a few more frames but I don't really see that being worth the cost for a dated game that has issues up the wazoo.

I'd highly reccomend for anyone who hasn't played Fallout 1-2 to give them a try as a heads up.