no, because all of this DLC and the concept of buying a 'super package' at the start it sort of supporting a market where developers DON'T give us full games to begin with. often they've literally simply chopped off parts and decided to hold them back. Not always, but often
I mean if you start to attempt to name off the number of games that have released DLC that really packed a huge amount of bang per buck it gets difficult. Even someone who I would generally consider fairly good with DLC, like Bethesda, in my opinion has dropped the ball with their recent games in terms of lacking QUALITY content in comparison to previous installments in franchises
gamers should speak with their wallets- don't but inflated 80$ games when half the time 60$ releases as it is are lacking content. I don't think its unreasonable at all for gamers to expect a great experience for 60$ or so. The studios just need to listen to gamers and focus on working harder creatively without a SOLEY die hard 'lets make money' mentality. I mean for gods sake look at something like EA and Battlefront- beautiful game but such a lack of good content. Its just sad. Too many big publishers have lost the balance between making money AND maintaing pride and passion for giving gamers great stuff. Its a big reason why you have smaller developers (compared to an Activision or EA) like the guys who make the "Witcher" series doing well now. Because they haven't quite yet been swallowed by the bigger corporation mentality of skimming the customer for all their worth
