By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Einsam_Delphin said:
It's pretty sad that they have to resort to anti-consumer practices to help keep gaming a sustainable business. They probably shoulda thought a bit more carefully before jacking up development cost.

No one "jacked up the cost of anything". HD gaming is just generally more expensive. And thats cause it needs more expensive talent. The day nintendo makes a zelda that looks like the wither 3 or horizon or FF15 (not just in scale or scope but also in fidelity) let's have a chat with them and see if they were able to accomplish it with anything under $50M and in anytime under 2 years. 

I also don't agree with the anti consumer claims, but I respect that everyone has where they draw their own lines. For me, the only anti consumer thing I can see now are games on PSN still costing $60 when on Amazon or GameStop the physical copy of the game can be had for as little as $30-$40. And maybe I would have looked at having to pay for online as anti consumer if that was the reason I actually pays for a PS4+ subscription. But generally I feel if you have the option of choice, then it's not anti consumer.