Do you want future Final Fantasy games to be more "fantasy" or "techy"?

[Ajax]

sc94597 said:

Ajax said:
yes, that's why I say medieval versus tech, cause things that I call fantasy, are things that we don't have in our world: dragons, magic crystals, materia, moogles, summons, bahamut, floating cities etc. and that you can have just as well in a tech setting like you have it in a medieval setting.. of course you can use that other definition and call fantasy medieval by definition and linkit to that age and mages and stuff..

"dragons, magic crystals, materia, moogles, summons, bahamut, floating cities etc"

All of those are in the medieval ones too.  I don't see where you get the conclusion that a more futuristic setting>medieval in terms of fantasy. You are mixing up scifi with fantasy. Fantasy most likely won't happen or never did, while science fiction may happen and could have happen. Fantasy deals more with magic and mythincal creatures, while scifi deals more with tecnology. No these genres do blend such in games or movies or books like final fantasy, but that doesn't mean that a more futuristic setting  is more relative to fantasy than a medieval. 

 

of course those are in the medieval settings too.. what I mean is that they can be in any setting.. or let me say that fantasy elements can be in any setting