| IDOLxISxDEAD said: As soon as I saw this thread title, I knew the circle-jerk would be strong with this one. I was not disappointed. "Sony is objectively the best and perfect and everything they do is superior to every other competitor in existence, whether it's TV, games, or any other kind of entertainment." *applause* *applause*
The statement "can't own two consoles cause I'm busy" makes no sense to me. This *almost* sounds like troll bait, but I can't really tell. I'm also married and have a full-time job and I still play games and consume entertainment 20-30 hours per week average, often with my wife. It's really a matter of priorities, not that you "can't" own two platforms. This logic is just backwards and nonsensical from the start, so being more honest and/or clarifying what you mean would probably get you more realistic answers from the usual Sony circle-jerk around here. Like many other people said, why not just have both? |
I would say money but that is never a good argument.
So I'm gonna say the real argument which OP already mentioned. Comfort and convenience. First of all having more than one console in your living room clutters things up, it's simply not worth the hassle to have double the plastic lying around. Switching between consoles dealing with two different ecosystems all the time is annoying. You have to keep track two subscriptions, remember which games you bought on which console and all that crap.
It's not like you can't have 2 or more cconsoles, it's because you don't want more than one console. Nobody wants that additional clutter including you.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
