palou said:
The goal of this (entirely theoretical) society would be to make culture (music, sports) seen as a common human heritage, and not something that distinguishes you from someone else - or, as often is the case, makes you better than someone else. Nationalism would be spread by making yourself associate with the greatest amount of people possible, in different contexts. Like, soccer clubs would engulf different areas than govermenatl districts, again distinct from the approximate ethnical distribution. Our differences should be seen as a fluid transition, not absolute. |
First, society wouldnt accept that.people like their culture, and wouldnt accept being force to adopt a culture that could be potentially completely different from them.Plus, culture is deeply rooted in nationalism, since many of each contries cultural values comes from the countries unique features, being the landscape, resources or any other stuff.
Plus it would make for a boring world in my opinion.Having a universal culture is very different from ahving many cultures in different countries.Not only it makes for a more interesting world, but the different points of view imrpoves the creativity of humankind.My opinion at least.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1