By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
Nautilus said:

Yeah, I agree completely.Not only that, but many are judging the game either by the metric you stated, or judging the game having played it in recent years, which obviosly will have a much lesser impact.This score was awarded, and rightfully so, back when the game was released(duh), which was revolutionary.It was a game with no par, being groundbreaking epic....

Its just a bit sad people saying that this game is overrated when most of them played them either the 3DS remake or emulated a few years back because they were too young to play when it released and feel the joy of playing back then.

Nope, what's really sad is someone attacking other peoples opinions and saying they aren't valid just because they disagree.

So my remark is "sad" because I am of this opinion(and being in my right to say this in the way I want without really insulting anyone) but your isnt?

"This. Saying 'they were that good at the time' seems kind of silly especially since some people here even played them at that time."

A bit of double-satndard, dont you think?

I can fully understand when people dont like the game.I mean, i dont like GTA while most people do.And while everyone has the right to say whatever they want about the game, I personally feel silly for people to say that the game is overrated and shouldnt have had the 99 score when this is the ONLY game to receive such score.So this is the only game reviewers were more biased about?The same goes for the other 3 games.Never played them, and while I could potentially score them lower based on my experiences, the game must have done something right to have been awarded such scores.Being biased only goes so far.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1