By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 22 July 2016
Edit Thread
trunkswd said:
DonFerrari said:
For me the biggest issue was ever how the hell they only knew 150 species (including even fossils) forever before gen 1, and then they can double the number of species and then triple or even go 5x more in a few years.

That was one of my biggest issues after the first couple gens. But the point made in the thread about how they look too anime for my liking is something I never thought of until now and I do see it. I stopped really caring after gen one and only played gen two once.

I think I didn't cross gen 3 as well... and I do really liked the concept of the first game and the pokemon design (but some odd balls like magneton)



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."