At this point, is Activision worse then Electronic Arts?

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Chazore said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Well... Firstly you didn't state that there will be free DLC for life and secondly, it is only $40 for the PC version. And what do you mean you have to pay to watch their press conference? You can watch Blizzcon for free on twitch... You can pay for their premium which allows you to watch their rewatch the games, replays and get special skins and goodies but the conference itself is free... 

And EA published TitanFall which was online only for $70 which had paid map packs so idk how you can say that Overwatch makes Blizzard a worse company when EA did something even worse than that... Yea TitanFall has larger space but space =/= quailty or content, specially since all of Overwatch's heroes and maps in the future will be free...

I imagine if asked "do you hate Bethesda or X company", Bethesda will be chosen because PC players got Skyrim remaster for free but you have to pay full price on current gen =P.

Also Overwatch's plan is so much better by miles comapred to Battlefront that launched with lacking content and then asks you to pay another £45 for season pass which still hasn't finished dripping all the content and it's nearing a year old already. Overwatch is simply buy and get future characters and maps for free, that's like tons better than what EA and Activision do these days.

Loll, it would be weird if Skyrim Remastered wasn't free tbh. Skyrim mods make the PC version look noticeably better than the remastered version anyway. So if they did charge for it, no one would buy it but at least this way, they can get some good publicity and maybe even get the people who havn't bought the dlcs to buy the dlc since it is only free if you own everything. 

But yea, I always find it hilarious when people cherry pick what they are saying and don't include certain things to make their argument look better than it really should.